Skip to content
LEVY & LANCEMEDIEVAL EUROPE · 500–1500

THE FIELD & THE RECORD

Grunwald 1410

An open field rewards manoeuvre, but pursuit can pull an army apart. Explore the Polish–Lithuanian victory and the opportunities for mounted troops.

15 July 1410 Near Grunwald and Stębark, present-day Poland

Play this battlefield
Grunwald 1410 — illustrated game terrain, not a historical survey
Illustrated game landscape. Terrain overlay in battle shows the authoritative playable squares.

01 / WHAT HAPPENED

The battle and the field

Opposing forces
Władysław II Jagiełło and Vytautas’s allied forces against the Teutonic Order under Ulrich von Jungingen.
Outcome
Polish–Lithuanian victory; the grand master and many of the Order’s leaders were killed.

The allied army met the Teutonic Order in the countryside around Grunwald and Tannenberg, now Stębark. Mounted formations played a major role. The fighting included a withdrawal of Lithuanian forces and pursuit by part of the opposing army, followed by continuing combat and the defeat of the Order’s main force. How much of that withdrawal was planned remains a question for interpretation. [2] [3]

Jagiełło’s letter to Queen Anna describes heralds bringing two swords and a challenge before the battle. It is a participant’s report, but also a victorious king’s explanation of his cause. Jan Długosz’s much fuller narrative was written about sixty years later; its vivid speeches, woods and changes of ground should not be read as a precise contemporary map. [1] [2]

02 / READING THE RECORD

What history can tell us

The sources differ in perspective and date. The king’s letter supplies contemporary testimony; Długosz was born after the battle. Modern scholarship also discusses a later letter advising against pursuing apparent flight, which complicates the older picture of a simple Lithuanian rout. [1] [2] [3]

03 / CONTEMPORARY VOICE

Words from the period

“we present you herewith these swords in token of that design”

Jagiełło’s letter to Queen Anna, July 1410, reporting the heralds’ challenge. [1]

Contemporary participant’s report in an English translation printed in The Polish Review, 15 July 1945, p. 12. The heralds’ words are reported speech, not a verbatim transcript.

04 / COMMANDER’S OVERVIEW

Advantages, difficulties and a plan

The following is tactical advice for this game map. Historical terrain informs the scenario; the numerical effects are game rules.

Open short grass

Advantage

Mounted troops gain an additional charge bonus after a clear run of at least four squares.

Difficulty

The same space exposes your flanks. An isolated pursuit can leave infantry and missiles behind.

Low hills

Advantage

Infantry can anchor a position with improved saves on hill squares.

Difficulty

A hill is not a guarantee against attacks from several directions; retain a mobile reserve.

Woodland, villages and damp hollows

Advantage

Edges offer cover or screen movement where sight is blocked.

Difficulty

Woods and marsh interrupt charge lanes. Check the full route, not just the destination.

Your opening decisions

Keep a cavalry reserve where it can reach more than one clear lane. Pin the enemy with infantry and missiles before committing mounted troops against an exposed side. When an opponent falls back, preserve mutual support instead of sending every fast unit in pursuit.

History and the game map

The broad grassland, hills and wooded edges are an illustrative tactical layout. Dry weather and the short-grass charge bonus are game rules; heat, dust, artillery and the historical coalition’s command arrangements are not simulated.

05 / FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

Historical references

Quotations are short extracts. Attributions identify the account’s date and viewpoint; a contemporary author is not necessarily an eyewitness. References checked 31 October 2026.

  1. Jagiełło’s letter — The Polish Review, 15 July 1945

    English translation of the king’s contemporary letter, printed p. 12 (PDF page 7), continued on p. 14; Jagiellonian Digital Library.

  2. Jan Długosz — The battle of Tannenberg or Grunwald

    Later fifteenth-century narrative in translation, hosted by De Re Militari; not a contemporary eyewitness account.

  3. Sven Ekdahl — Different points of view on Grunwald/Tannenberg

    Modern study of the written traditions, national interpretations and evidence concerning pursuit.

Further reading: Grunwald 1410 on Seven Swords ↗

Explore the other battlefields